![]() (I have trouble explaining why I found that sequence of one and two-word sentences so funny, but I read it over and over out loud). "For concentration," I said, "you need a cat. I said something to the effect that he must have had an interesting life. Hawkins is invited to a fancy dinner party, and finds herself seated next to "a red-face retired Brigadier General" (rather a stock character, which Sparks is totally aware of): At a point in the middle of the book, Mrs. I finished reading A Far Cry from Kensington, by Muriel Spark. Muriel Spark herself has an economical way of telling a story, a manner I now aspire to, since all too often I am more Leslie than Fleur. "I didn't sleep with him for his prose style." She said, "You didn't say this when you were sleeping with him." He never reached the point until it was undetectably lost in a web of multisyllabic words and images trowelled on like cement. I meant to tell her more about Leslie's prose, its frightful tautology. In return, Fleur attacks Leslie's own literary work: Dottie has just said that Fleur's book, Warrender Chase is "a thoroughly sick novel" (and, thus, we are reading a sick novel). But I haven't finished the book yet.ĭottie and Fleur are talking on the phone. Despite their contentious relationship, which involves stolen manuscripts, among other misbehavior, Dottie and Fleur seem entangled for life. Fleur is talking to a frenemy, Dottie, whose husband Leslie Fleur has slept with. It does have more sex, which plays a role in the quotation below. It's inspired by the same period in Spark's life as A Far Cry From Kensington, though is more distant from the actual publishing milieu. And Fleur gets accused of libeling people despite the fact that she wrote her novel before she met those people, or they did the things she wrote about. It's about a writer, Fleur Talbot, who finds that aspects of reality begin the mimic events in a novel she has written. Entertaining, of course, but not as easy a read as some of the others. Properties.Now I'm in the middle of Loitering With Intent. Properties of the font property along with the non-inherited Short-hand properties figure 21 illustrates the defaulted short-hand This can occasionally create a bit of confusion, because defaulted ![]() Here is an article that give a good explanation - (Note: the relevant item is at the bottom of the article - figure 21 - unfortunately the relevant section doesn't have a heading). background color), it will appear as greyed/dimmed text. If a rule exists in that set but is not applied because it's a non-inheritable property (e.g. The rules which are applied to the currently selected element appear in normal text. the rule was applied to an ancestor, and the selected element inherited it), chrome will again display the entire ruleset. In the case where a rule is applied to the currently selected element due to inheritance (i.e. I guess, for the sake of completeness, dev tools shows all the rules from that set, whether they are applied or not. Note: Chrome dev tools "style" panel will display a rule set, because one or more rules from the set are being applied to the currently selected DOM node. It involves inheritance which is a bit more complicated.it's a default rule/property the browser applies, which includes defaulted short-hand properties.For me the current answers didn't explain the issue fully enough, so I am adding this answer which hopefully might be useful to others.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |